The Vietnam Spy Who Betrayed Us, Part II

August 5th, 2009 in Military History by Paul Davis

In my last espionage blog I wrote about Pham Xuan An (1927-2006), a Time correspondent and “friend” to American and South Vietnamese military and government officials and journalists during the Vietnam War who was later revealed to have been a top Viet Cong spy.

I thought Larry Berman’s Perfect Spy: The Incredible Double Life of Pham Xuan An, Time Magazine Reporter and Vietnamese Communist Agent (Smithsonian Books) was an uncritical and loving look at the spy. The book was biased, I believe, by Berman’s left-wing, anti-war views.

Thomas Bass’ The Spy Who Loved Us: The Vietnam War and Pham Xuan An’s Dangerous Game (Public Affairs) is a bit more balanced.

Like Berman, Bass interviewed An in Vietnam before the spy died. Bass writes that when An was working for Reuters in the 1960s: “He was the irrepressible man about town who knew everything about everybody and was seen everywhere, in all the city’s best restaurants and cafes, chatting and joking with everyone from generals and ambassadors down to the local cyclo drivers and dance hall girls. An established himself as the go-to man for newly arrived Americans who needed a tip. He was always generous with is advice and stories, always a good source of local color. The news reports filed out of Vietnam that started with an anecdote provided by An must number in the thousands.”

Bass notes that although An rarely claimed to have done anything more during the war than observe and analyze events, there were times that he “reached behind the curtain to adjust the scene.”

One example was the battle of Ap Bac in 1963, where the Viet Cong at battalion strength defeated the South Vietnamese, who were supported by American air and artillery. Bass writes that two Viet Cong soldiers received North Vietnamese military exploit medals for the victorious battle. One was the commander of the communist forces. The other was An, who devised the winning strategy.

An also helped plan the Tet Offensive in 1968, in which eighty thousand communists troops simultaneously attacked targets in South Vietnam. The communists briefly held the city of Hue, but the popular uprising the communists planned on didn’t happen and the overall attack was a military defeat.

Bass notes that the communists lost more than half of their troops in the south and perhaps a quarter of the North Vietnamese Army regular forces from the north.

“The offensive destroyed the Vietcong as a fighting force,” An admitted to Bass. “Then the United States introduced the Phoenix Program, which was extremely effective in assassinating thousands of Vietnamese communists and neutralizing the opposition in the south.”

But despite the military failure, Tet was considered to be a success for the communists as the fighting viewed on TV and the negative reports by anti-war journalists eroded the American public’s confidence in the war. Tet provided the communists with a major psychological victory.

More on An in my next blog.

Paul Davis also writes an American Crime blog for GreatHistory.com. His web site is http://home.comcast.net/~pauldavisoncrime/site/and his e-mail address is daviswrite@aol.com.

About the Author: Paul Davis has been a student of crime and espionage since he was a 12-year-old aspiring writer growing up in South Philadelphia. He enlisted in the U.S. Navy when he was 17 in 1970 and served on an aircraft carrier during the Vietnam War. He performed security work as a young sailor and later as a Defense Department civilian employee. As a writer he has covered crime, espionage, terrorism and the military for newspapers, magazines and Internet publications.

Related Articles

3 Responses to “The Vietnam Spy Who Betrayed Us, Part II”

  1. wilson said:

    “An also helped plan the Tet Offensive in 1968″

    I have serious doubts that the North Vietnamese General Staff and Le Duan and General Giap would have allowed a “spy” to have any access with higher Tet Offensive planing other than at the local level, perhaps with the Viet Cong. It sounds to me as if An was intent on raising his status in the history books without any investigation by the authors. I don’t care if An was the most brilliant military strategist since Julius Caesar, allowing a man behind enemy lines to plan the greatest offensive ever launched by North Vietnam would not be either sane nor acceptable to a communist nation run and planned by a Central Committee in Hanoi.

  2. Paul Davis said:

    Considering that the Tet Offensive was a complete and utter military failure, I’m not sure that bragging about helping to plan it would elevate one’s status.

    An was a top spy for the Viet Cong and the Viet Cong were under the control of the North Vietnamese. An’s reports were read by Ho Chi Minh and other top Viet Cong and North Vietnamese leaders.

    An assisting in the planning of Tet by identifing targets to be attacked in South Vietnam during the offensive. As he knew the country, the South Vietnamese and American leadership, and the American press corp very well, his views were valued by the top leadership of the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese.

    As I noted in the first two parts of my three-part series, I’m not an admirer of An and I suspect his “love” for Americans, but I have to admit that he was a devasting spy against us.

    Paul Davis

  3. [...] There were several articles released on GreatHistory.com, including In Defense of the Wild and The Vietnam Spy Who Betrayed Us, Part II. [...]

What is Great History?

Great History's mission is to provide a home for the best and brightest history bloggers writing today. We also allow members to create their own personal blogs and share their writing with our community. Our goal is to bring together all the best in history!

What We Write About

Weider History Group Magazines

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
History Blog Directory