Okay, here’s the plan: we pump a bunch of troops into Afghanistan and they gain an immediate combat superiority over the Taliban which enables us to pound them and drive them south and east against the anvil of the Pakistani drive into South Waziristan. Then in twelve months, our work done, we start packing up to come home.
Did someone forget to talk this through with the Pakistanis?
Everything’s in place, our troops are arriving, our secretary of defense is in Pakistan to work out details, and what does Pakistan announce? No military campaign against the Taliban in Pakistan for at least another year.
Really? Well that’s . . . inconvenient.
Pakistan has since modified their position to include the possibility of some sort of action starting within six months, but no guarantees. Here’s the Link.
This is neither a reflection on Pakistani fecklessness nor on U.S. strategic vision. It is instead an illustration of the fact that in conflicts such as these we are not masters of our own destiny. We cannot win this war for the Afghans nor for the Pakistanis; at best all we can do is help them win for themselves. But if their vision of the threat and their notion of victory differ from ours, there is nothing we can do about it. The problem is we are gambling a lot of lives and treasure on their judgment, not ours.
About the Author: The major landmarks in Frank's historical interests range from ancient Persia through the Crimean War, World War II, and the modern U.S. Armed Forces, with a lot of stops in between. Frank is fascinated by the unusual, the overlooked, and the surprising. He is the New York Times number one best-selling author of the Desert Shield Fact Book (1991) and he is currently writing an historical novel on Alexander's conquest of Persia – from the Persian point of view.
Related Articles |














Isolde said:
Excellent post, very thought provoking.
January 26th, 2010 at 2:18 pm
Frank Chadwick said:
Thank you for the comment, Donna.
January 27th, 2010 at 2:55 pm