<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Margaret Sanger in Context</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greathistory.com/margaret-sanger-in-context.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greathistory.com/margaret-sanger-in-context.htm</link>
	<description>The Best Blogging in History</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:44:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TomDem55</title>
		<link>http://greathistory.com/margaret-sanger-in-context.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2631</link>
		<dc:creator>TomDem55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greathistory.com/?p=398#comment-2631</guid>
		<description>Chris Smith, consistantly anti choice, Sanger, a visionary, and a hero tried to help women gain control over their own bodies, Victorian Mores or whatever we may call them are still with us, politicians who are for birth, but not for health care, who are for control of women and their reproductive lives.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Smith, consistantly anti choice, Sanger, a visionary, and a hero tried to help women gain control over their own bodies, Victorian Mores or whatever we may call them are still with us, politicians who are for birth, but not for health care, who are for control of women and their reproductive lives&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Williams</title>
		<link>http://greathistory.com/margaret-sanger-in-context.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2383</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greathistory.com/?p=398#comment-2383</guid>
		<description>And in a related story . . .

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100002972/what-the-hell-did-ruth-bader-ginsburg-mean-when-she-linked-abortion-and-eugenics/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in a related story . . .</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100002972/what-the-hell-did-ruth-bader-ginsburg-mean-when-she-linked-abortion-and-eugenics/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100002972/what-the-hell-did-ruth-bader-ginsburg-mean-when-she-linked-abortion-and-eugenics/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas paine</title>
		<link>http://greathistory.com/margaret-sanger-in-context.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2199</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas paine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greathistory.com/?p=398#comment-2199</guid>
		<description>margaret sanger was white trash, unsuitable for breeding</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>margaret sanger was white trash, unsuitable for breeding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Williams</title>
		<link>http://greathistory.com/margaret-sanger-in-context.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1924</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greathistory.com/?p=398#comment-1924</guid>
		<description>My wife and I have 6 children and 13 grandchildren. Frankly, I couldn&#039;t care less what Sanger believed about large families. While I agree there is a problem with our &quot;soundbite society&quot; and pulling quotes out of context, I think it is true that Sanger held some very strange views and had a darker side of which most people are unaware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife and I have 6 children and 13 grandchildren. Frankly, I couldn&#8217;t care less what Sanger believed about large families. While I agree there is a problem with our &#8220;soundbite society&#8221; and pulling quotes out of context, I think it is true that Sanger held some very strange views and had a darker side of which most people are unaware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: traceymc</title>
		<link>http://greathistory.com/margaret-sanger-in-context.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>traceymc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greathistory.com/?p=398#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>Dave-
I&#039;m not advocating for Sanger&#039;s sainthood. Some of the eugenics positions she held make me uneasy.

Martin-
I bet dinner at your house would shed some real light on the subject.

Either way gents, thanks for more context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave-<br />
I&#8217;m not advocating for Sanger&#8217;s sainthood. Some of the eugenics positions she held make me uneasy.</p>
<p>Martin-<br />
I bet dinner at your house would shed some real light on the subject.</p>
<p>Either way gents, thanks for more context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdula</title>
		<link>http://greathistory.com/margaret-sanger-in-context.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1458</link>
		<dc:creator>mdula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greathistory.com/?p=398#comment-1458</guid>
		<description>Great piece Tracey. 

What I found most interesting after reading that chapter was that while Sanger introduced her argument for the immorality of large families with the poorest-of-the-poor examples, she seemed equally disgusted (would she take issue with using that word to describe her opinion?) with the prospect of even materially well-off couples having large families. I also found it curious that she seemed to imply that the women of yesteryear were better suited to having large families.

With children aged 4,3,and 1 (and with a teacher&#039;s salary to boot), I don&#039;t have far to imagine what her opinion of me would be. 

If her arguments were valid then, I would have to say, though, that perhaps they have been heeded too well. Has the ubiquitous perfect family of mom, dad, boy, and girl made us a stronger, happier, more selfless country, or has it had, in part, the opposite effect? My bet is on the latter. 

At any rate, I wish she were here so she could come to dinner at my place. Perhaps some Guajillo Sauce enchiladas would win her over :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great piece Tracey. </p>
<p>What I found most interesting after reading that chapter was that while Sanger introduced her argument for the immorality of large families with the poorest-of-the-poor examples, she seemed equally disgusted (would she take issue with using that word to describe her opinion?) with the prospect of even materially well-off couples having large families. I also found it curious that she seemed to imply that the women of yesteryear were better suited to having large families.</p>
<p>With children aged 4,3,and 1 (and with a teacher&#8217;s salary to boot), I don&#8217;t have far to imagine what her opinion of me would be. </p>
<p>If her arguments were valid then, I would have to say, though, that perhaps they have been heeded too well. Has the ubiquitous perfect family of mom, dad, boy, and girl made us a stronger, happier, more selfless country, or has it had, in part, the opposite effect? My bet is on the latter. </p>
<p>At any rate, I wish she were here so she could come to dinner at my place. Perhaps some Guajillo Sauce enchiladas would win her over <img src='http://greathistory.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://greathistory.com/margaret-sanger-in-context.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1349</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greathistory.com/?p=398#comment-1349</guid>
		<description>Learn what was behind these eugenic activities by watching the documentary Maafa 21.  A preview of the program is available on www.maafa21.com .  this film was premiered at the Capital Visitor Center&#039;s theater in DC recently, and members of Congress, along with their staff, were stunned by this powerful documentary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Learn what was behind these eugenic activities by watching the documentary Maafa 21.  A preview of the program is available on <a href="http://www.maafa21.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.maafa21.com</a> .  this film was premiered at the Capital Visitor Center&#8217;s theater in DC recently, and members of Congress, along with their staff, were stunned by this powerful documentary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
